Follow your curiosity

What would you like to understand?

A few places to start.

ExplainerHow SNAP works: who qualifies for food stamps and what they getA plain-language guide to SNAP eligibility, the income tests, how benefits are calculated, what you can buy and the most common myths.ExplainerCan the government take away your U.S. citizenship?What the Constitution and the Supreme Court say about losing citizenship, how denaturalization works, and what the proposed Enemy Expatriation Act would have changed.ExplainerSeparation of church and state, explainedWhat the First Amendment’s religion clauses say, where the phrase “wall of separation” comes from, and how the Supreme Court’s approach has changed.ExplainerHow to spot a hyperpartisan headline (using this domain’s own past as the example)Seven checks for a viral political headline, with a real case study: a 2016 headline from the former Addicting Info that BuzzFeed News flagged.ExplainerAstroturfing and paid commenters: how fake grassroots campaigns workWhat astroturfing is, documented examples from fake FCC comments to state troll farms, and the signs of a coordinated campaign.

Press Esc to close.

Elections & Congress / Explainer

Does high turnout help one party? What the evidence says

The conventional wisdom says high turnout helps Democrats. Research and recent elections suggest it is much less predictable than that.

A long-standing piece of political folk wisdom says that when more people vote, Democrats win, because younger, lower-income and minority citizens who lean Democratic are less likely to vote. A 2014 post on this domain’s former site argued a version of it, and a Skeptics Stack Exchange thread later asked whether the claim held up. The evidence says: not reliably.

What researchers have found

Political scientists have tested the idea for decades. In The Turnout Myth (2020), Daron Shaw and John Petrocik examined presidential, Senate and gubernatorial elections over many decades and found no consistent relationship between turnout levels and which party wins. One reason is that occasional voters are not reliably partisan: they tend to be less attached to either party and more swayed by the conditions of a particular year, like the economy or a scandal.

What recent elections show

  • 2014: Midterm turnout was the lowest in decades, and Republicans won the Senate. That fit the folk theory.
  • 2018: Midterm turnout was the highest in a century, and Democrats won the House.
  • 2020: Turnout was the highest share of eligible voters since 1900. Democrats won the presidency, but Republicans gained House seats.
  • 2024: Turnout stayed high by historical standards, and Republicans won the presidency, helped by gains among lower-propensity voters.

The pattern of the 2020s, in which infrequent voters have leaned more Republican in several contests, has made campaigns on both sides rethink who benefits from turning out new voters.

Why the myth persists

The groups that vote less often do, on average, lean Democratic in surveys. But turnout surges are not drawn evenly from those groups, and the same forces that drive turnout up, like an energized opposition, also shift how existing voters choose. Turnout is a result of the political environment as much as a cause of the outcome.

Where to find the numbers

The University of Florida’s Election Lab (formerly the U.S. Elections Project) publishes turnout as a share of eligible voters, which is more accurate than share of the voting-age population because it excludes non-citizens and, in many states, people with felony convictions. The Census Bureau’s Current Population Survey reports who voted by age, race and income after each federal election.

Spotted an error? See our corrections policy.

Continue exploring elections & congress

More on elections & congress

All elections & congress →